EU leaders have directed the European Commission to produce an update of its long-term climate strategy “by the first quarter of 2019”, writes Megan Darby, deputy editor of Climate Home News. Climate campaigners welcome the move, saying it sends an important political signal. Article courtesy Climate Home News.
The EU leaders set the deadline for a 2050 greenhouse gas emissions cutting plan at a European Council meeting finishing on Friday ¨23 March*. It will update the 2050 low-carbon economy roadmap drafted in 2011.
Climate commissioner Miguel Arias Canete tweeted there was “no time to lose” as the EU forges ahead with the low-carbon transition.
Campaigners welcomed the move.
“It’s hard to succeed on the climate transition unless you know where you’re going,” tweeted Jonathan Gaventa, director at environmental think-tank E3G, adding that the previous 2050 roadmap was “already badly out of date on technology costs”.
The EU has a target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 80% by 2050, agreed when the international goal was to limit global warming to 2C.
“This is an important step that will set the wheels in motion for raising the EU’s climate target. This will prove beyond doubt that the current climate target for 2030 is insufficient and trigger its review and increase”
In the Paris Agreement, governments upped ambition, saying temperature rise should be held “well below 2C” and to 1.5C if possible. Noting that voluntary national commitments were collectively inadequate, it created a framework for periodically ratcheting up efforts.
An important political signal
The European Council decision sent “an important political signal,” said Gaventa. “Some within EU institutions had begun to see big climate questions as too difficult and too divisive, and so started to drag their feet. Today’s unanimous conclusions shows the top-level political appetite is there.”
Wendel Trio, director of Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe, said: “This is an important step that will set the wheels in motion for raising the EU’s climate target. The new strategy needs to outline what efforts the EU will pursue to keep temperature rise within the 1.5C limit set in the Paris Agreement. This will prove beyond doubt that the current climate target for 2030 is insufficient and trigger its review and increase.”
“To be a climate leader, Europe must act fast, ditch fossil fuels and fully embrace renewables and energy efficiency”
The latest analysis from the International Energy Agency this week showed EU emissions rose slightly in 2017, for the second year in a row, as renewables deployment slowed.
Greenpeace EU climate and energy policy adviser Tara Connolly said: “Governments are effectively admitting that Europe’s climate change policy needs a reality check. This is good news, but real change needs more than just words. To be a climate leader, Europe must act fast, ditch fossil fuels and fully embrace renewables and energy efficiency.”
Editor’s Note:
Megan Darby is Climate Home’s deputy editor. She previously wrote about UK energy and water industries for leading sector publication Utility Week. She holds a Mathematics degree from Newcastle University.
This article first appeared on Climate Home News and is republished here under this website’s Creative Commons licence.
[adrotate banner=”78″]
Mike Parr says
Would that be a long term climate strategy with salad or fries? Anything else sir?
One problem is that earnest phrases such “low carbon transition” are usually followed by “renewables must play a role in the market” (TM: Karins MEP) and “no more subsidies for renewables”. I’ll leave readers to spot the contradictions.
Meanwhile in the background the non-event of EU ETS continues to provide no significant price for carbon emissions and member states re-arrange deck-chairs (the game, children is called “capacity markets” – yes Simon – you can play using “capacity mechanisms” as well).
The phrase “It’s hard to succeed on the climate transition unless you know where you’re going,” is oh so true & the contradictions above suggest that the EU either at a member state level or at an institutional level hasn’t got a clue. On the bright side – by 2050 most current EU “leaders” will be pushing up the daisies so won’t be around to blame. The 2050/80% will only be achieved through meaningful energy efficiency actions – & goodness me the member states like energy efficiency – lots of support – just no action.
Taking one member state and showing just how dumb politcos can be: Germany – both the CDU & its variants plus the SPD are facing political wipe out by the AfD in east Germany. Reason: no jobs/badly paid jobs. An energy efficiency programme worthy of the name focused on the residential sector and paying respectable wages would start to address this. Won’t happen cos the Bundesbank prefers to keep its piggy banks full. & thus we come to the core of the problem – money.
No money – no de-carb – no 2050/80%. The nice Mr Draghi (at the ECB – prop: Bundesbank) had lots of lovely money for his banker mates Euro60bn/month – but don’t think there will be anything like that for de-carb no siree! & thus the EU “climate strategy” is like potemkin villages – a facade with no substance, regardless of what Mr Canete might assert. & lastly – do remember the EU mantra: markets-work, markets are the only solution, private bankster money good, public government money bad, two legs good, four legs bad etc – is that sniggering at the back of the class I hear?