President-elect Joe Biden knows that a divided Congress and Senate will make passing most legislation very difficult, not least his sweeping decarbonisation agenda. However, there is one area where both Republicans and Democrats share the same goals, and that is nuclear power. Jennifer Gordon at the Atlantic Council explains why this can clear a path for nuclear while other elements of Biden’s clean energy programme may struggle and even fail. Already, in the last few years a raft of nuclear policies has been passed into law with bipartisan support. The goal is to promote innovation, commercialisation and ultimately to become an exporter of nuclear plants. It makes sense for a nation that was a nuclear pioneer, and where nuclear generates 20% of its electricity and half its total low carbon supply.
With former Vice President Joe Biden now the President-elect of the United States, enthusiasm on the left is tempered by the likelihood that Republicans will keep the Senate. Climate policy is one of a few key areas in which Democrats hope to implement sweeping change by introducing federal policies to cut carbon emissions aggressively and invest significantly in infrastructure and technologies to speed decarbonisation.
However, while the full scope of Democratic policies may not be realised by the next Congress, legislation that encourages the rapid deployment of nuclear energy technology represents an area where Democrats and Republicans can continue to work together—as they have over the last four years—on advancing technologies with the potential to decarbonise power systems at home and abroad.
Getting the U.S. back on track
Although the United States formally withdrew from the Paris Agreement on November 4th, Biden has committed to rejoining the accord on the first day of his presidency, an action that he can accomplish with a stroke of the pen and without congressional approval. Under the Paris Agreement, the United States has pledged to reduce carbon emissions by 26 percent over 2005 levels, by 2025, but as of today, the United States is only on track to reduce emissions by 17 percent within that same timeframe.
Federal policy will be crucial to making up the gap and putting the United States on a faster path to decarbonisation; however, many policies that could aid decarbonisation and require congressional approval (such as placing a price on carbon or renewing investment tax credits for renewable energy sources) may not make progress under a Republican-led Senate.
Nuclear gets support from both Republicans and Democrats
However, nuclear energy—a low-carbon source of reliable power—has champions on both sides of the aisle and should receive attention from a Democratic administration looking to pass climate legislation.
With bipartisan support, Congress passed the Nuclear Energy Innovation Capabilities Act (NEICA), which was signed into law in 2018. Congress passed the Nuclear Energy Innovation and Modernization Act (NEIMA) in December 2018, and it was signed into law in 2019. NEICA helps establish public-private partnerships through the US Department of Energy’s Gateway for Accelerated Innovation in Nuclear (GAIN) program in order to speed the development of the next generation of nuclear reactors.
Although advanced reactors are unlikely to be commercialised by 2025, their success can make a difference for US and global climate targets within the next decade. Similarly, NEIMA—which modernises the regulatory process for nuclear reactors—was introduced by Senator John Barrasso (R-WY) and co-sponsored by ten Republican and eight Democratic senators.
Next-gen Nuclear: commercialise and export
Strong bipartisan congressional support for nuclear reactors—both the existing fleet and also the next generation of advanced reactors—is in line with the emphasis in Biden’s climate and energy plans on the importance of the domestic nuclear fleet as a source of low-carbon energy as well as the next generation of nuclear energy technologies.
The current fleet—which accounts for 20 percent of total US electricity generation and more than half of low-carbon electricity generation in the United States—is integral to limiting carbon emissions, while commercialising and exporting advanced nuclear reactors is critical for US national security and global security and safeguards. As a statesman and national security expert, Biden should continue to support initiatives that will ensure that the United States can commercialise and export the next generation of nuclear technologies.
There are still more opportunities for bipartisan cooperation on nuclear energy policy. In July, the Nuclear Energy Leadership Act (NELA) was passed in the Senate as an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 with bipartisan support, but it was not included in the House version of the bill. Both chambers will have to agree on a final version of NELA before the new president can sign it into law. Support for NELA, which focuses on advanced reactor demonstration and developing advanced reactor fuel, would send a powerful signal from the Biden Administration. This also holds true for the Nuclear Energy Research and Development Act (NERDA), which was introduced in the House by Rep. Conor Lamb (D-PA-17) earlier this year.
The Biden Administration will need to identify energy policy areas that advance its climate policy goals and that are palatable on both sides of the aisle. Since congressional Republicans and Democrats have shown their support for a robust domestic reactor fleet and for a strong civil nuclear export program, nuclear energy offers an opportunity for Biden to pass bipartisan legislation while achieving his climate goals.
***
Jennifer Gordon is Managing Editor and Senior Fellow at the Atlantic Council Global Energy Center
This article was written for the Atlantic Council Global Energy Center’s blog, EnergySource
Fredrik Lundberg says
Propagandistic article from right wing think tank. Not to be believed.
Nuclear is controversial in the Democratic Party. California is phasing out nuclear, New York is decreasing it. Many republicans are unenthusiastic, because as Wall Street wants no part of it, everything has to be paid by the taxpayers or the ratepayers.
And nuclear power is not just a question of political will, bipartisan or not.
Nuclear power is withering away in the US. Since 2014, 7 reactors have been shuttered, more to follow. 2 of the only 4 new reactors under construction since 1980 has stopped construction. Five more reactors are to be shuttered in 2021, even if the bribed subsidy to Ohio reactors will be sustained.
There is no “next generation of nuclear energy technologies”. What would that be?
Fusion? Going nowhere since 1951.
Fast breeder reactors, now called Generation IV? An unending series of expensive fiascos, in the US (stopped in 1976), Germany and UK (stopped in the 1980s), France (stopped late 1990s), Japan (stopped a few years ago), India (reactor under construction, under construction since 2004), China (one reactor, operated for 26 hours). Only hope is Russia!
Small modular… grow up!
By the way, solar and wind are doing fine.