Energy Post

Daily reports on the European and Global energy transition

  • Newsletter
  • Search Categories
    • Renewables
    • Policy
    • Oil, Gas & Coal
    • Hydrogen
    • Outlooks
    • Grids
    • Nuclear
    • Markets
    • Transport
    • Videos
  • 24-linkedin 24-twitterfacebook Follow-Us

Understanding how consumers engage with energy data is essential for delivering a “Clean Energy Package for all Europeans”

January 29, 2019 by Georgiana Huiban

In its new policy framework “the Clean Energy for All Europeans Package”, the European Commission highlights the key and central role of consumers in the global transition to a low-carbon society. It proposes to help consumers save money and energy through better information and give them a wider choice of action when choosing their participation in energy markets. … [Read more...]

Filed Under: Community, Energy efficiency, Platform Tagged With: consumers behaviour, dynamic pricing, Energy, energy consumers, energy feedback, feedback channels

Most read this week

  • ‘Green Deal Industrial Plan’ explainer: 40%+ of the top low-carbon technologies must be made in the EU by 2030 by Daisy Dunne | posted on March 24, 2023
  • What is the future of Woody Biomass in the EU energy mix? by Simon Göss | posted on March 21, 2023
  • Blending Hydrogen into the gas network: the challenges of pipeline fractures, faster flow rate + more by NREL | posted on March 10, 2023
  • 10 Carbon Capture methods compared: costs, scalability, permanence, cleanness by Ella Adlen | posted on November 11, 2019
  • Hydrogen’s innovation pipeline: signals strong ahead of World Hydrogen Summit in Rotterdam, May 9-11, 2023 by Ian Shine | posted on March 21, 2023
  • Should U.S. DOE risk funding methane-based Hydrogen production when CCS is still not proven? by Suzanne Mattei | posted on March 27, 2023
  • Understanding the new EU ETS (Part 2): Buildings, Road Transport, Fuels. And how the revenues will be spent by Simon Göss | posted on February 6, 2023
  • Silicon Valley Bank failed. Don’t blame the Climate Tech it backed by Rushad Nanavatty | posted on March 23, 2023
  • Buildings “Energy Performance Certificates”: piloting new tools to ramp up renovations by Patricia Contreras Tejada | posted on March 20, 2023
  • What’s best for Hydrogen transport: ammonia, liquid hydrogen, LOHC or pipelines? by Herib Blanco | posted on May 5, 2022
  • The 10 big problems with simply replacing fossil cars with electric by Schalk Cloete | posted on December 6, 2021
  • Gravity Batteries: any nation can do it at scale using rocks by Simon Read | posted on July 27, 2022
  • Micro-nuclear reactors: up to 20MW, portable, safer by Christina Nunez | posted on April 22, 2021
  • EU Energy Outlook to 2060: how will power prices and revenues develop for wind, solar, gas, hydrogen + more by Alex Schmitt | posted on December 6, 2022
  • Hydrogen production in 2050: how much water will 74EJ need? by Herib Blanco | posted on July 22, 2021
  • Extract CO2 from our air, use it to create synthetic fuels by James Conca | posted on October 11, 2019
  • U.S. IRA: what can Europe do to stop its firms relocating to America? by Charles Wessner | posted on March 17, 2023
  • New U.S. study: damage per ton of CO2 costs $185, not the official $51 by Maximilian Auffhammer | posted on October 7, 2022
  • EU ETS and CBAM: what the big update to emissions trading rules means for Europe’s key sectors by Simon Göss | posted on January 16, 2023
  • Critical Minerals: will there be enough to meet the 2050 net-zero emissions target? by Lilly Yejin Lee | posted on March 14, 2023

Information

  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy including Cookies
  • Terms and conditions for posting content
  • Comment Policy

More Information

  • About us
  • Authors
  • Contact Us

Most read in last 24 hours

  • Recent Posts
  • Recent Comments
  • Most Commented
  • Most Viewed
  • Tags
  • The problem with CO2e: we need separate emissions data for each climate pollutant (methane, soot, etc.)
  • Should U.S. DOE risk funding methane-based Hydrogen production when CCS is still not proven?
  • ‘Green Deal Industrial Plan’ explainer: 40%+ of the top low-carbon technologies must be made in the EU by 2030
  • Silicon Valley Bank failed. Don’t blame the Climate Tech it backed
  • Hydrogen’s innovation pipeline: signals strong ahead of World Hydrogen Summit in Rotterdam, May 9-11, 2023
      • The problem with CO2e: we need separate emissions data for each climate pollutant (methane, soot, etc.)
      • carbon bubble
      • CCS
      • China
      • climate change
      • coal
      • coal power
      • diversification
      • electric cars
      • electricity
      • electricity market
      • emissions
      • energy2030
      • energy efficiency
      • energy security
      • energy storage
      • energy trade
      • energy transition
      • EU
      • EU energy policy
      • EU ETS
      • European gas market
      • EVs
      • financing
      • gas
      • geopolitics
      • grid
      • grids
      • hydrogen
      • infrastructure
      • natural gas
      • nuclear energy
      • oil
      • renewables
      • Russia
      • shale gas
      • smart grids
      • solar
      • solar power
      • sustainable mobility
      • transport
      • unconventionals
      • US
      • US energy policy
      • wind
      • wind power

      Recent Posts

      What is the future of Woody Biomass in the EU energy mix?

      The problem with CO2e: we need separate emissions data for each climate pollutant (methane, soot, etc.)

      Should U.S. DOE risk funding methane-based Hydrogen production when CCS is still not proven?

      ‘Green Deal Industrial Plan’ explainer: 40%+ of the top low-carbon technologies must be made in the EU by 2030

      Silicon Valley Bank failed. Don’t blame the Climate Tech it backed

      Hydrogen’s innovation pipeline: signals strong ahead of World Hydrogen Summit in Rotterdam, May 9-11, 2023

      Copyright © 2023 Energy Post. All Rights Reserved