A public-private consortium backed by the U.S. DoE is developing a new nuclear fuel – a mix of thorium and uranium – that looks like a major advance on the fuels currently in use, says Jim Conca. Called “Advanced Nuclear Energy for Enriched Life” (ANEEL), it has a very high fuel burn-up rate (55,000 MWd/T) compared to the usual uranium (7,000 MWd/T). That high burn-up reduces the waste by over 80%. Less spent fuel means less refuelling, less down-time and less cost. Conca emphasises that capacity additions are growing fast in the developing world, which can lack the infrastructure for clean wind, solar, gas and hydro. Developing countries in urgent need of new power capacity can be offered ANEEL-fuelled nuclear plants as an alternative to the favoured dirty coal. Another important benefit is that the reduction in spent plutonium means there’s less chance of the material being weaponised, reducing the risk of nuclear weapons proliferation. The consortium plans to go to market with this technology by 2024.
For decades, nuclear engineers have dreamt up new formulas, shapes and sizes for the radioactive fuel that powers the reactors of the world’s nuclear power plants (our greatest source of zero-carbon electric power). Today most of what’s used for reactor fuel is enriched uranium. In the future, fuel compositions could shift toward the very promising element thorium.
A potential breakthrough: The United States Department of Energy (DOE) Idaho National Laboratory (INL) and the Nuclear Engineering & Science Center at Texas A&M have partnered with Clean Core Thorium Energy (CCTE) to fabricate a new type of nuclear fuel, called “Advanced Nuclear Energy for Enriched Life”, or ANEEL.
With a proprietary combination of thorium (Th) and uranium (U), particularly “High Assay Low Enriched Uranium” (HALEU), ANEEL fuel can address several issues that have plagued nuclear power – cost, proliferation and waste. Plus, this fuel, being made-in-America, positions it as a prime candidate for export to emerging nuclear markets.
Over the last several years, there has been a growing consensus among climate scientists that nuclear energy is critical for mitigating the worst effects of global warming. Nations and states are shifting from Renewable Energy Mandates to technology-neutral Clean Energy Standards that include nuclear energy.
Developing nations want energy fast: it’s either Coal or Nuclear
But in developing nations, the need is urgent. Most do not have the infrastructure to install natural gas, wind or solar. Additionally, many do not have sufficient topography and river flow for hydro. So it’s either coal or nuclear. If you care at all about the environment, then it better be nuclear.
Advanced Nuclear Energy for Enriched Life – ANEEL
So developing new technologies, especially advanced fuels, is critical for this deployment. The ANEEL fuel can be used in traditional boiling water and pressurised water reactors, but it really shines when used in heavy water reactors, like the CANDU and the PHWR. More importantly, it can be developed and deployed rather quickly.
CCTE plans to go-to-market with this technology by 2024.
“Today, emerging countries and their citizens, ever hungry for the power needed to drive the engines of progress and prosperity, need an abundant and uninterruptible source of clean base-load power. This solution must address multiple key barriers, including cost, efficiency, and sustainability,” says Mehul Shah, CEO and Founder of CCTE. “The urgency of realising such a vision becomes even more critical as time is lost in the face of an accelerating climate crisis.”
Ideal for CANDU and PHWR reactors
The CANDU (Canada Deuterium Uranium) reactor was developed in the 1950s in Canada, and more recently in India as the PHWR (Pressurised Heavy Water Reactor). These reactors are heavy water cooled and moderated pressurised water reactors.
PHWRs/CANDUs are well established small and medium reactors (see figure above). All of Canada’s 20 nuclear reactors are of the CANDU design. Other nations with CANDU reactors include Argentina, China, India, South Korea, Pakistan, and Romania. India has 18 PHWRs that are based on the CANDU design. The nearly 50 CANDU and PHWR reactors comprise roughly 10% of reactors worldwide.
On the other hand, there are 30 countries considering, planning or starting nuclear programs, and an additional 20 countries, most of which are in developing countries, that have expressed an interest in launching a nuclear program in the future (see figure below). The CANDU/PHWR is an optimal reactor choice for developing nations, when equipped with the right fuel.
The advantages of ANEEL fuel
CANDU/PHWRs generally use natural uranium (0.7% U-235) oxide as fuel, so they need a more efficient moderator (the material that slows or moderates the speed of the neutron so it hits the next nucleus at the right speed to split, or fission, it). In this case, these reactors use heavy water (D2O). Deuterium is hydrogen with one neutron in its nucleus.
…more resistant to meltdowns
Additionally, thorium has a higher melting point and lower operating temperature which makes it inherently safer than straight U and more resistant to core meltdowns.
…high fuel burn rate
The ANEEL fuel has a very high fuel burn-up rate of about 55,000 MWd/T (megawatt-day per ton of fuel) as compared to natural uranium fuel used in currently operating PHWRs/CANDUs with a burn-up of around 7,000 MWd/T. This is important in a few ways.
Higher burn-up means the fuel stays in the reactor longer and gets more energy out of the same amount of fuel. Also, more neutron poisons breed in over the fuel’s use, including Pu-240,241,242 making the spent fuel prohibitively difficult to make into a weapon.
Also, a higher fuel burn-up of ANEEL fuel reduces the waste by over 80% and ends up with much less plutonium (Pu) because more of the Pu is burned to make energy while making the spent fuel proliferation resistant. Less spent fuel means less refuelling, less cost, less fuel handling and less volume to dispose.
…refuelled at full power
In addition, PHWR/CANDU reactors don’t have to be shut down to refuel, and can be refuelled at full power. The Kaiga Unit-1 Indian PHWR, and Darlington Unit 1 in Canada, hold the world records for continuous operation at 962 days and 963 days of uninterrupted operation, respectively.
In an existing CANDU/PHWR using natural uranium, each fuel bundle weighs roughly 15 kg. After the first 150 days of operation, an average of eight such bundles would need to be replaced daily for the rest of the reactor’s operating life of 60 years.
With the ANEEL fuel, each fuel bundle weighs approximately 10.65 kg. After the first 1,400 days of operation, an average of only one such bundle would need be replaced daily for the remainder of the reactor’s operating life, leading to significantly less waste.
The interesting thing about Thorium
Like most even-numbered heavy isotopes, Th-232 doesn’t fission easily. But like non-fissile U-238 forming Pu-239 through neuron sorption which then fissions to produce energy, Th-232 also absorbs a neutron, then quickly double-beta decays to U-233 which then fissions to produce energy.
Dr. Sean McDeavitt, Nuclear Engineering Professor and Director of the Nuclear Engineering & Science Center at Texas A&M University, notes, “I’ve been actively working on and around nuclear fuel behaviour and applications for over 25 years. The ANEEL fuel concept integrated with the existing CANDU/PHWR reactor technology takes advantage of thorium’s superior properties, performance, and abundance to generate clean base-load electricity with reduced environmental impact.”
Texas A&M will fabricate the ANEEL fuel pellets at their Nuclear Engineering and Science Center and deliver them to INL. INL will conduct high burn-up irradiation testing of the ANEEL fuel pellets (up to 70,000 MWd/T) in INL’s accelerated test rig at their Advanced Test Reactor. This will be followed by post irradiation examination and fuel qualification, all under the stringent guidelines and quality assurance requirements of the DOE and the NRC.
“We look forward to supporting these efforts to develop advanced nuclear fuels. As the nation’s centre for nuclear energy research and development, INL supports industry needs with unique facilities, capabilities and expertise.” – Jess Gehin, Ph.D., INL chief scientist.
There is well over twice as much Th on earth than U. And like U, it can be extracted from seawater, making nuclear completely renewable, as renewable as the wind. India itself has more Th than U, particularly as monazite sands, a reason they have been pursuing Th in nuclear reactors for decades.
Nuclear proliferation and the geopolitical implications
The advantages of the ANEEL fuel fit several elements in the United States Department of Energy’s recently released Restoring America’s Competitive Nuclear Energy Advantage which says nuclear power is intrinsically tied to national security.
Whenever the United States is involved in another country’s nuclear program, that country signs various agreements related to security, weapons nonproliferation and nuclear materials, including nuclear fuel.
Agreements like a 1-2-3 Agreement, and other agreements like those committing the country to forgo domestic uranium enrichment and reprocessing of spent fuel are put in place, as well as signing the International Atomic Energy Agency‘s Additional Protocol, which institutes more stringent inspection regimes.
To date, the U.S. has entered into roughly twenty-three 1-2-3 Agreements with 48 countries, including the Ukraine, Morocco, Egypt and Taiwan.
But the United States’ nuclear program has atrophied over the last few decades. At the same time, other countries have strengthened, particularly Russia and China, both of whom have state-owned enterprises and are less than caring about security and environmental concerns, as well as others like South Korea whose industry is government-supported in ways that just can’t happen in the United States.
So having a new fuel made in America that can be used in reactors in other countries brings the United States back into play in the nuclear supply chain, and allows us to reach more of the nations around the world.
With current bilateral recognition in the United States that nuclear is necessary for clean base-load energy, CCTE’s ANEEL fuelled PHWR/CANDU reactors could be deployed to more emerging countries faster by easing concerns of proliferation and waste management.
And maybe we can actually decrease the amount of coal burned.
James Conca is an earth and environmental scientist and a regular contributor to Forbes magazine
S. Herb says
There’s not enough information here for me to have a definite opinion, but it sounds very practical compared to the proposed molten salt Th232/U233 reactors with their required built-on hot radiochemical processing facilities. Also to note is that the coming massive increase in electrolyser facilities could provide part of the required heavy water enrichment as a side-benefit. I do find interesting the statistic that over a sixty year lifetime of a standard CANDU reactor 175,000 fuel modules are replaced, averaging 8/day.
Van Snyder says
Non-fissionable thorium-232 breeds fissionable uranium-233 by absorbing excess neutrons from fission. The cross-section is such that the maximum breeding rate is 1%. The doubling time is about seventy years. A thorium-based nuclear energy economy implies reprocessing. No ifs, ands or buts. The United States alone has 90,000 tons of 95% unused fuel, erroneously called nuclear waste. The unused fuel is dangerously radiotoxic for 300,000 years. Pretending it can be hidden is daft. The pyramids were plundered before 500 years! The 5% of spent fuel that is fission products needs custody for 300 years. This is a tractable problem. Actually, only 9.26% of that 5% needs custody for that long. Half the rest is innocuous before thirty years and the rest isn’t even radioactive. Spent fuel should be reprocessed and consumed in fast neutron reactors before jumping into thorium with both feet.
Jim Conca says
Yes, all waste should be burned in fast reactors, but new fuel is so cheap that that might take a long time to get to. But there’s so little waste, it’s not a problem to store or dispose. I don’t think anyone’s going to plunder spent fuel, it’s too easy to do it other ways.
I do think we should experiment with all sorts of designs and fuel, we are no where near finished figuring out what’s best, cheapest, etc.
Gert C van Uitert says
CANDU reactors have a positive temperature coefficients.
That means that if the temperature in the core increases the power increases as well.
Normally CANDU reactors use natural uranium. It contains 0,711 % 235U.
For the control of the reactor the delayed neutron fraction is crucial.
For 235U it is one delayed neutron after 140 prompt ones. Fraction 0,007 or 0,71%
For 233U, which is breeded from thorium, it is one delayed neutron after 360 prompt ones.
Fraction 0,0027 or 0,27%. That is less than half the value of 235U.
The safe control area is consequently smaller with ANEEL than natural uranium fuel.
Jim Conca says
Hope the testing at INL investigates these issues.
Rida Milany says
As a matter of fact, the positive temperature reactivity coefficient is not a characteristic of CANDU but rather of natural uranium fuel in CANDU. With thorium , the temperature reactivity coefficient becomes very negative which is an important improvement. This will offset to some extent issues related to reduced fraction of delayed neutrons.
Jim Conca says
excellent! Great point!