The higher the energy density of your battery, the further your EV can travel. But the standard lithium-ion batteries used in EVs are reaching their theoretical upper limit for energy density. A new design is needed to break through that ceiling and make it commercially viable. Mark Shwartz at Stanford University describes their research into lithium-metal batteries, which should double the energy per unit weight. One big challenge was to create a stable electrolyte for the new battery. They did this using a novel fluorine compound thatâs easy and cheap to make. The stability tests proved dramatic: the fluorine electrolyte allowed the battery to last for 420 cycles of charge and discharge â normally itâs about 30 cycles for lithium-metal. These are still prototypes and further R&D is needed, but battery performance is crucial to the future of e-mobility. The research was part-funded by the U.S. DOEâs research consortium, Battery500, which is aiming to lift lithium-metal battery performance from 180 to 500 watt-hours per kilogram. Lithium-ion batteries typically deliver 220 Wh/kg.
A new lithium-based electrolyte invented by Stanford University scientists could pave the way for the next generation of battery-powered electric vehicles.
In a study published June in Nature Energy, Stanford researchers demonstrate how their novel electrolyte design boosts the performance of lithium metal batteries, a promising technology for powering electric vehicles, laptops and other devices.
âMost electric cars run on lithium-ion batteries, which are rapidly approaching their theoretical limit on energy density,â said study co-author Yi Cui, professor of materials science and engineering and of photon science at the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory. âOur study focused on lithium metal batteries, which are lighter than lithium-ion batteries and can potentially deliver more energy per unit weight and volume.â

A conventional (clear) electrolyte on the left and the novel Stanford electrolyte of the right. (Image credit: Zhiao Yu)
Lithium-ion vs. lithium metal
Lithium-ion batteries, used in everything from smartphones to electric cars, have two electrodes â a positively charged cathode containing lithium and a negatively charged anode usually made of graphite. An electrolyte solution allows lithium ions to shuttle back and forth between the anode and the cathode when the battery is used and when it recharges.
A lithium metal battery can hold about twice as much electricity per kilogram as todayâs conventional lithium-ion battery. Lithium metal batteries do this by replacing the graphite anode with lithium metal, which can store significantly more energy.
âLithium metal batteries are very promising for electric vehicles, where weight and volume are a big concern,â said study co-author Zhenan Bao, the K.K. Lee Professor in the School of Engineering. âBut during operation, the lithium metal anode reacts with the liquid electrolyte. This causes the growth of lithium microstructures called dendrites on the surface of the anode, which can cause the battery to catch fire and fail.â
Researchers have spent decades trying to address the dendrite problem.
âThe electrolyte has been the Achillesâ heel of lithium metal batteries,â said co-lead author Zhiao Yu, a graduate student in chemistry. âIn our study, we use organic chemistry to rationally design and create new, stable electrolytes for these batteries.â
New, improved electrolyte
For the study, Yu and his colleagues explored whether they could address the stability issues with a common, commercially available liquid electrolyte.
âWe hypothesised that adding fluorine atoms onto the electrolyte molecule would make the liquid more stable,â Yu said. âFluorine is a widely used element in electrolytes for lithium batteries. We used its ability to attract electrons to create a new molecule that allows the lithium metal anode to function well in the electrolyte.â
The result was a novel synthetic compound, abbreviated FDMB, that can be readily produced in bulk.
âElectrolyte designs are getting very exotic,â Bao said. âSome have shown good promise but are very expensive to produce. The FDMB molecule that Zhiao came up with is easy to make in large quantity and quite cheap.â
âIncredible performanceâ â 420 charge-discharge cycles
The Stanford team tested the new electrolyte in a lithium metal battery.
The results were dramatic. The experimental battery retained 90 percent of its initial charge after 420 cycles of charging and discharging. In laboratories, typical lithium metal batteries stop working after about 30 cycles.

PhD candidates and lead authors Hansen Wang, left, and Zhiao Yu, right, testing an experimental cell in their laboratory. (Image credit Hongxia Wang.)
The researchers also measured how efficiently lithium ions are transferred between the anode and the cathode during charging and discharging, a property known as âcoulombic efficiency.â
âIf you charge 1,000 lithium ions, how many do you get back after you discharge?â Cui said. âIdeally you want 1,000 out of 1,000 for a coulombic efficiency of 100 percent. To be commercially viable, a battery cell needs a coulombic efficiency of at least 99.9 percent. In our study we got 99.52 percent in the half cells and 99.98 percent in the full cells; an incredible performance.â
Anode-free battery
For potential use in consumer electronics, the Stanford team also tested the FDMB electrolyte in anode-free lithium metal pouch cells â commercially available batteries with cathodes that supply lithium to the anode.
âThe idea is to only use lithium on the cathode side to reduce weight,â said co-lead author Hansen Wang, a graduate student in materials science and engineering. âThe anode-free battery ran 100 cycles before its capacity dropped to 80 percent â not as good as an equivalent lithium-ion battery, which can go for 500 to 1,000 cycles, but still one of the best performing anode-free cells.â
âThese results show promise for a wide range of devices,â Bao added. âLightweight, anode-free batteries will be an attractive feature for drones and many other consumer electronics.â
The Battery500 consortium
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is funding a large research consortium called Battery500 to make lithium metal batteries viable, which would allow car manufacturers to build lighter electric vehicles that can drive much longer distances between charges. This study was supported in part by a grant from the consortium, which includes Stanford and SLAC.
By improving anodes, electrolytes and other components, Battery500 aims to nearly triple the amount of electricity that a lithium metal battery can deliver, from about 180 watt-hours per kilogram when the program started in 2016 to 500 watt-hours per kilogram. A higher energy-to-weight ratio, or âspecific energy,â is key to solving the range anxiety that potential electric car buyers often have.
âThe anode-free battery in our lab achieved about 325 watt-hours per kilogram specific energy, a respectable number,â Cui said. âOur next step could be to work collaboratively with other researchers in Battery500 to build cells that approach the consortiumâs goal of 500 watt-hours per kilogram.â
In addition to longer cycle life and better stability, the FDMB electrolyte is also far less flammable than conventional electrolytes, as the researchers demonstrated in the embedded video.
âOur study basically provides a design principle that people can apply to come up with better electrolytes,â Bao added. âWe just showed one example, but there are many other possibilities.â
[Flammability test of conventional carbonate electrolyte (left) and the novel FDMB electrolyte (right) developed at Stanford. The conventional carbonate electrolyte is flammable immediately after touching the flame, but the FDMB electrolyte can tolerate the direct flame for at least three seconds. (Credit Zhiao Yu)]
Other Stanford co-authors include Jian Qin, assistant professor of chemical engineering; postdoctoral scholars Xian Kong, Kecheng Wang, Wenxiao Huang, Snehashis Choudhury and Chibueze Amanchukwu; graduate students William Huang, Yuchi Tsao, David Mackanic, Yu Zheng and Samantha Hung; and undergraduates Yuting Ma and Eder Lomeli. Xinchang Wang from Xiamen University is also a co-author. Zhenan Bao and Yi Cui are senior fellows at Stanfordâs Precourt Institute for Energy. Cui is also a principal investigator at the Stanford Institute for Materials & Energy Science, a joint SLAC/Stanford research program.
This work was also supported by the Battery Materials Research Program in the DOE Office of Vehicular Technologies. Two of the co-authors are supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program and the TomKat Center Postdoctoral Fellowship in Sustainable Energy at Stanford. The facility used at Stanford is supported by the National Science Foundation.
***
Mark Shwartz is a Communications Associate, Precourt Institute for Energy at Stanford University
This article is published with permission
Just dump Battety Powered Electric Vehicles…. and bring in CAV’s (Compressed Air Vehicles)… they are Safe, Much Lower “Ownership Cost” and donot generate Toxic, Dangerous Battery Waste either…. CAV’s (WITHOUT TAKING CREDIT FOR FREE AIR CONDITIONING) have a lower “Efficiency”… but the Higher Whr/mile and “Charging Cost/km is more than offset by Lower Capital and additional Battery Replacement Costs of Battery EV’s.
[ If Energy “lost” in Air Compression is Recovered/Utilized…. even the Efficiency Handicap will reduce and with free AirConditioning…. can pissibly even overcome this Handicap….].
So what is holding back CAV’s…???