The coronavirus slump has come suddenly and hit hard. The deep thinking has already begun on the economics needed to turn around that slump without damaging our rising emissions ambitions. Julia Poliscanova at Transport & Environment looks at the car industry. Some have called for the new CO2 standards coming in 2020 to be postponed (though, notably, VW and BMW still support them). She explains that total car sales were already declining in January and February, a trend that cannot be blamed on the pandemic. In contrast, EVs have been achieving record sales. As CO2 targets are for the fleet average (not individual models), falling total sales need not overturn the electric/petrol mix and a firmâs ability to meet the rising targets and their commitment to EVs. Consumers with smaller budgets may even help if they now buy smaller cars: be they EV or gasoline, both are better for emissions. On the subject of taxpayer bailouts, many car firms made profits in the billions in 2019, so any pandemic-linked support should be limited, says Poliscanova. If given, it should maintain the EV momentum: pro-EV scrappage schemes, charging infrastructure and grid upgrades, public money in exchange for higher emissions targets. The car industry bailouts of the 2008/9 crisis did little for EVs, despite promises to do so. This time it should be different.
As the coronavirus is bringing Europe to a halt, major carmakers and many suppliers – like the rest of the EU economy – are shutting down their factories. The priority now is to ensure the health, safety and job security of the roughly 2.6 million auto workers who are likely to need government support as they are sent into temporary unemployment.
This comes as a huge blow to one of Europeâs most prized industries, but exactly how hard-hit it will be is hard to say at this stage. The main parameter impacting the fate of the car industry is demand for motor vehicles.
Car sales were down before the pandemic
The shutdown will almost certainly accelerate the recession that was already on its way in early 2020 with car sales down by 7.4% in the first two months. But whether demand collapses or consolidates will depend on how Europe and national governments manage the recovery.

SOURCE: European Automobile Manufacturers Association (ACEA)
Some car firms are calling for postponement of CO2 targets
A speedy economic recovery is clearly carmakersâ absolute top priority as this is what determines whether people will have the resources to buy new cars. However, some carmakers apparently cannot resist the temptation to use the coronavirus crisis to attack environmental regulations. Some are already calling for a delay of the EU car CO2 standards entering force this year.
Does the corona crisis mean the EU CO2 regulations ought to be scaled back or that fines be waived?
The first thing to understand is that the car CO2 target, which was agreed in 2008, is a fleet average target. So, falling car sales do not automatically affect compliance. What would impact compliance is if the type of vehicles sold changes.
Record growth in EV sales
Secondly, the electric car market saw a record growth across Europe in the first two months of 2020. Every 15th car sold in Germany in February had a plug, amounting to a record 7% of new sales. France recorded an even more impressive 9% sales share, with similar explosions in Italy and Spain.
Since the EV market is driven by the company car and fleets market, and that market is in turn driven by the total cost of ownership and fiscal rules, we would expect demand for EVs to remain solid. All of this means carmakers are actually on track to achieve the CO2 target of 95g/km on the 95% of their 2020 sales – the real test comes in 2021 when the Merkel âphase-inâ comes to an end.
Thirdly, the majority of the electric cars planned to comply with the regulations have not yet rolled off production lines, including VWâs ID.4, Fiatâs e-500 and Seatâs Leon PHEV. So if the closures remain short term, electric car production will not be majorly affected.
Finally, whilst a recession is bad news for carmakers profits and employment, it doesn’t mean higher CO2 emissions. In 2009, in the midst of the financial crisis, new car CO2 emissions fell by a record 5,1%. This was thanks to a shift towards smaller, less powerful vehicles as well as thanks to generous and targeted scrappage schemes.
Sales of small cars
Higher sales of small cars would also help now – for example, the Peugeot 108 and Citroenâs C1 both emit 85g/km and cost âŹ10,000. And compared to 2009, small electric car models such as the Renault Twingo are available and affordable when coupled with national grants.
Keeping the CO2 standards: lessons learned from the 2008 crisis
It should be noted here that VW and BMW put out statements saying the 2020 standards should be kept intact. They deserve praise for this.
Beyond keeping the CO2 regulations in place, the question is what support should be given to the car industry to weather the crisis? First, letâs learn from past mistakes. Amid the 2008-2009 financial crisis, Barrosoâs European Economic Recovery Plan injected âŹ7.56 billion cash loans into the EU car industry. On paper, these huge sums, rising to over âŹ20 billion by 2015, were supposed to help investment in green cars.
In practice, carmakers cheated emissions tests (culminating in Dieselgate), the gap between real-world and lab fuel consumption sky-rocketed, SUV sales boomed, and, apart from Renault and BMW, no-one invested in electric cars. And just as Kia and others are weaponising the corona crisis today, carmakers in 2009 used the financial crisis to caution against âadditional costly vehicle legislation for a number of yearsâ.
The car industry has been making huge profits
Taxpayers should also not be asked to foot the bill for the temporary drop in revenue and profits of an industry that until recently had recorded huge profits: the VW Group earned a record net profit of over âŹ19 billion in 2019, FCA âŹ4.3 billion, âŹ3.58 billion for PSA and âŹ2.7 billon for Daimler – enough to sustain a short-term setback.
Support, with conditions
Support measures must come with conditions. First, workers’ job security must be top priority, not shareholder profits. Second, scrappage schemes and other support measures should be focused on electric cars; the government should invest massively in recharging infrastructure and grid upgrades; and companies could enjoy temporary incentives if they go electric in the coming year.
Third, these should not be empty promises, but the conditions clearly defined, targets quantified and continuous monitoring assured. Fourth, such a big injection of public cash to shore up private companies in bad times needs to be accompanied by a commitment to do better in good times – through stricter CO2 standards beyond 2025.
There is no denying the coronavirus marks the beginning of a period of turbulence for the European car market. But we need to learn from the past and ensure public money is well spent. The crisis will not last forever – hopefully it will be short. But whatever happens, we need to make sure Europe emerges from it more competitive and innovative with a zero emissions product portfolio fit for the 21st century. This will secure our industryâs markets globally and jobs at home, and it is essential to stop the other looming global crisis, global warming.
***
Julia Poliscanova is the Director, Clean Vehicles and Emobility at Transport & Environment
This article is published with permission
Dear Ms Poliscanova
A year ago, distinguished earth scientists informed the UK’s Government that its “net zero GHG emissions legislation would inevitably result in disappointment.
Their case applies to all concerned in this effort and is well laid out at https://www.nhm.ac.uk/press-office/press-releases/leading-scientists-set-out-resource-challenge-of-meeting-net-zer.html
I do not see you addressing the pending scarcity of battery metals nor caring much about the massive pollution, including CO2 emissions, of mining these and invite a response.
Thanks in advance,