Europe’s largest iron ore producer, LKAB of Sweden, plans to invest almost €40bn over the next two decades in emissions-free steel production. LKAB, along with Vattenfall and SSAB, are behind the HYBRIT project which intends to grow, fossil-free, Sweden’s steel industry. They will use hydrogen instead of coal as the “reducing agent” to remove the oxygen from the iron ore. Thomas Koch Blank at RMI runs through their strategy and the implications inside and outside the steel sector. The cost of producing the hydrogen should come down with their commitment to making it at scale. Aiming for 10GW of electrolyser capacity, that’s a quarter of the total EU target for 2030. It’s very good news for any other hard-to-abate sector hoping to use hydrogen. They expect their steel production to be competitive without subsidies beyond the EU carbon price. Blank says the project can set an example for steel makers around the world and suggests clean steel could even experience the successful cost reductions of solar.
A recent announcement by Europe’s largest iron ore producer, LKAB, may seem like a technical detail only relevant for metallurgists and steel nerds. However, the company’s plan to invest up to 400 billion kronor (US$46 billion) over the next 15–20 years to expand into an emissions-free iron process being piloted in Northern Sweden is big news for Sweden, the global steel industry, and future generations around the world.
From a climate change perspective, steelmaking is considered one of the “hard-to-abate” sectors. Given that the industry contributes directly to 7 percent of all global greenhouse gas emissions, it is impossible to ignore it. But in contrast to other areas of our society—such as automobiles or power generation—technical solutions to replace conventional methods have seemed either quite expensive or simply unknown. However, this view has rapidly changed over the course of only a few years, and Swedish industry has played a pivotal role in this shift.
The HYBRIT project
In 2016, the HYBRIT project was launched as a joint venture between the utility Vattenfall, iron ore producer LKAB and steel maker SSAB. Both Vattenfall and LKAB are owned by the Swedish state, while SSAB was privatised in 1994. And with the political backing and de-risking of the early stage of the HYBRIT project, it can be argued that HYBRIT is the outcome of a long-standing political intent to ensure a competitive basic industry sector in Sweden.
Looking forward, with customers, investors and policymakers increasing pressure to adhere to the Paris Agreement, reducing greenhouse gas emissions is a critical element of maintaining competitiveness.
Using Hydrogen, not Coal, as a reducing agent
The process that HYBRIT is currently piloting in Luleå, a small town in northern Sweden, holds the key to unlocking dramatic CO2-emissions reduction for steelmaking. By using hydrogen instead of coal as a “reduction agent”—to remove the oxygen from the iron in iron ore—the most critical step in the steel value chain becomes virtually free of carbon emissions. These steel plants can replace polluting blast furnaces with a process that emits water vapor instead of CO2.
On November 23, LKAB announced that it intends to integrate forward in the steel supply chain and start producing “sponge iron” as a value-added product from its current pellet product, using the HYBRIT process. This pivot in business strategy has major significance for the global steel industry.
There are three reasons LKAB’s announcement is big news for the global steel industry as well as the economy at large:
- LKAB will single-handedly contribute to greenhouse gas reductions corresponding to more than 50 percent of Sweden’s total footprint by obviating the need for blast furnaces—many of which are located in other nations
- The hydrogen required will significantly contribute to bringing down the cost of this zero-carbon fuel, which in turn can help the economy to address emissions from other sectors such as aviation or shipping
- While the process trials are still ongoing (the pilot plant is producing sponge iron, but its scaffolding has hardly been taken down) the confidence demonstrated by this announcement clears up any questions as to whether this technology will be commercially scalable
Implications for the Global Steel Industry
Sweden is a small economy that already has a comparatively clean energy supply. However, LKAB’s stated strategy to over time integrate forward into primary steelmaking not only enables thousands of jobs with strengthened long-term competitiveness, it also reduces disproportionate amounts of greenhouse gas emissions.
This will enable Sweden to punch significantly above its weight class. LKAB’s total production of 27 million tons of iron ore products corresponds to 18 million tons of crude steel. If that steel were produced in conventional blast furnaces, it would lead to emissions of 28 million tons of CO2—more than 50 percent of Sweden’s total footprint of 52 million tons of CO2 equivalents.
Implications for other sectors and the “Hydrogen economy”
Steel production is only one of many potential uses for hydrogen. Indeed, other sectors that are technically challenged to reduce emissions will likely have to rely on cheap hydrogen. Today the cost of hydrogen for fuel cell trucks or buses, as well as using hydrogen (or ammonia) as an aviation or maritime fuel, is prohibitively high. Yet costs are expected to come down as the technology is deployed at scale.
The sponge iron capacity that LKAB could build out corresponds to half a million large fuel cell vehicles, a significant step towards the “hydrogen economy” envisioned by the European Commission. The production of the hydrogen could require as much as 10 GW worth of electrolyser capacity, which is a quarter of the total EU target for 2030.
LKAB’s ambition to build a sponge iron plant as early as 2027, just one year after SSAB plans to retire its blast furnace in Oxelösund, speaks volumes in terms of the technology confidence the joint venture has already established. Furthermore, Göran Persson, chairman of the board and former prime minister of Sweden, claims that the investments shall be made without any government support, expecting it to be competitive without subsidies beyond the EU carbon price. LKAB is also setting itself up as a single company to grow its DRI (direct reduced iron/sponge iron) capacity by 30 percent per year over 20 years, diminishing any doubt that the technology can be scaled fast.
Steel’s global picture
In the big picture, while this constitutes a significant step towards a decarbonised steel industry, the impact corresponds to less than 1 percent of the emissions from the global steel industry. But even though it’s unrealistic to expect that the whole steel industry will turn upside down to adopt this new technology given the scale of investment in existing blast furnaces, other iron ore companies can of course replicate LKAB’s forward integration.
The main iron ore sources in the world, in Australia, South Africa, and Latin America, have access to drastically cheaper renewable energy than Sweden. This makes for an even more competitive product using this highly electrified process. Indeed, in these locations zero-carbon steel can be competitive with blast furnaces completely without subsidies.
Can Clean Steel match the rapid cost reductions of Solar?
The leadership demonstrated by LKAB serves as a role model for the kind of outside-the-box and whole-systems thinking that is required for the global economy to decouple economic growth from greenhouse gas emissions. Change requires exploration of new concepts and solutions. Bold action both creates new opportunities and uncovers new underlying challenges.
For example, adding 10 gigawatts (GW) of load, given Sweden’s current total installed generation capacity of 40 GW, will require significant investments in both renewable generation capacity and grid infrastructure. But for utilities, this opportunity is providing a much-needed headwind to achieve a zero-emission power system, as investing in a growing market is significantly easier than with stagnant demand.
The fact that the impact on global emissions will not be credited to Sweden in the political protocols negotiated under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change underscores the value of corporate action. The private sector remains the most reliable engine for innovation in our economy.
Technology disruption is by definition challenging to forecast. In the solar industry, the International Energy Agency (IEA) has consistently under-estimated both near- and long-term capacity additions to an almost comical degree. Yet the private sector has managed to out-perform expectations, and this is true for LKAB and the HYBRIT team just as it has been for the solar industry.
In comparison, the official position of Jernkontoret, the Swedish Steel Association, that it will take “20 – 30 years until this technology can be introduced into large-scale industrial production” is conservative, to say the least. The World Steel Association is almost completely silent about the opportunity of both hydrogen-based reduction and other alternative technologies. The association’s 2020 positioning paper maintains a narrative around need for long-term R&D rather than rapid deployment support.
But whether the industry associations are acknowledging it or not, the snowball has started to roll down the slopes of the Luossavaara and Kirunavaara mountains (the ‘L’ and ‘K’ in LKAB) and the avalanche will hit the global steel industry within this decade. Survivors of the impact will re-emerge to ski in clean powder snow. Casualties will be buried under the masses, anchored down by strategically untimely investments in CO2-intensive technology.
Thomas Koch Blank is a Senior Principal, Industry and Heavy Transport, at Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI)
This article is published with permission. Copyright 2020, Rocky Mountain Institute
Phil Mortimer says
How is the hydrogen to be produced? Electrolysis requires a steady state position. Using methane generates a net negative energy/.emissions balance.
Much seems to be predicated on the cost of H” falling .
What happens if it does not? There seems to be a Gadarene rush to embrace technologies that have yet to be tested at a full commercial scale.
Ivan Quail says
Thanks very much for this most informative article. Good to see Sweden is getting on with it. Any information on what cost per kg for the hydrogen production is required?
Nathan Wilson says
Sweden is the perfect location to show-case this futuristic technology, due to its clean electric grid, lack of domestic coal resources, and their recent (2017) commitment to carbon neutrality by 2045.
Sweden, along with peers France and Switzerland are the only developed countries that have such clean electricity (thanks to a combination of hydro and nuclear power). The flexibility resulting from their enormous hydro proportion (38%) allows them to grow their grid supply using wind-power to support baseload applications like steelmaking, without the need for fossil fuel balancing or energy storage.
Even so, the article’s claim the technology is already cost competitive seems to contradict other sources, such as https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652619330550#fig1.
So a high price for carbon emissions will be a factor in the economic success of the project.