Energy Post

Daily reports on the European and Global energy transition

  • Newsletter
  • Search Categories
    • Renewables
    • Policy
    • Oil, Gas & Coal
    • Hydrogen
    • Outlooks
    • Grids
    • Nuclear
    • Markets
    • Transport
    • Videos
  • 24-linkedin 24-twitterfacebook Follow-Us

COP 27: a way forward for methane, fossil fuel (not just coal) phase-out, and U.S.-China competition?

December 9, 2022 by Ben Cahill, Sandeep Pai and Taiya Smith

COP 27 was never expected to have the impact that COP 26 did, and that’s how it turned out, explain Ben Cahill, Sandeep Pai and Taiya Smith at CSIS. But there are three issues that can have long term positive impacts if carried forward successfully. The first is some good news on methane emissions. The U.S., the EU, Japan and other countries announced an important producer-consumer effort to cut greenhouse gas emissions from traded gas, while … [Read more...]

Filed Under: Energy, Policies Tagged With: China, coal, COP27, emissions, EU, finance, gas, geopolitics, Japan, LossAndDamage, methane, oil, UK, US

COP 27: “Loss & Damage” can become the fourth pillar of climate action, along with mitigation, adaptation and finance

December 1, 2022 by Lola Vallejo

COP27 saw two major outcomes on the finance front: the creation of a “Loss and Damage” fund and a call to reform international financial institutions. It made fewer, if any, advances to reduce emissions, and narrowly missed sending a global call to phase down oil and gas consumption. But funding the emissions reductions of developing and vulnerable nations was a gap that had to be filled, and so this is a big step forward, explains Lola Vallejo … [Read more...]

Filed Under: Energy, Investment Tagged With: accountability, adaptation, Barbados, BridgetownAgenda, emissions, EU, finance, funding, India, LossAndDamage, mitigation, Pakistan, V20

COP 27: an analysis of what gets prioritised and ignored at UN climate negotiations

November 7, 2022 by Jennifer Allan and Rishikesh Ram Bhandary

Getting an issue on the agenda of a COP is essential for its chances of being dealt with properly. Jennifer Allan at Cardiff University and Rishikesh Ram Bhandary at Boston University, writing for Carbon Brief, have analysed 218 agendas, tracking 502 agenda sub-items, going back to the first COP in Berlin in 1995. Certain agendas stand out – Adaptation, Mitigation, Finance, Transparency, Technology, Capacity Building, Response Measures, … [Read more...]

Filed Under: Energy, Policies Tagged With: adaptation, agendas, COP27, finance, industry, LossAndDamage, mitigation, transparency, UNFCCC

Most read this week

  • ‘Green Deal Industrial Plan’ explainer: 40%+ of the top low-carbon technologies must be made in the EU by 2030 by Daisy Dunne | posted on March 24, 2023
  • What is the future of Woody Biomass in the EU energy mix? by Simon Göss | posted on March 21, 2023
  • Blending Hydrogen into the gas network: the challenges of pipeline fractures, faster flow rate + more by NREL | posted on March 10, 2023
  • 10 Carbon Capture methods compared: costs, scalability, permanence, cleanness by Ella Adlen | posted on November 11, 2019
  • Hydrogen’s innovation pipeline: signals strong ahead of World Hydrogen Summit in Rotterdam, May 9-11, 2023 by Ian Shine | posted on March 21, 2023
  • Should U.S. DOE risk funding methane-based Hydrogen production when CCS is still not proven? by Suzanne Mattei | posted on March 27, 2023
  • Understanding the new EU ETS (Part 2): Buildings, Road Transport, Fuels. And how the revenues will be spent by Simon Göss | posted on February 6, 2023
  • Silicon Valley Bank failed. Don’t blame the Climate Tech it backed by Rushad Nanavatty | posted on March 23, 2023
  • Buildings “Energy Performance Certificates”: piloting new tools to ramp up renovations by Patricia Contreras Tejada | posted on March 20, 2023
  • What’s best for Hydrogen transport: ammonia, liquid hydrogen, LOHC or pipelines? by Herib Blanco | posted on May 5, 2022
  • Gravity Batteries: any nation can do it at scale using rocks by Simon Read | posted on July 27, 2022
  • The 10 big problems with simply replacing fossil cars with electric by Schalk Cloete | posted on December 6, 2021
  • Micro-nuclear reactors: up to 20MW, portable, safer by Christina Nunez | posted on April 22, 2021
  • EU Energy Outlook to 2060: how will power prices and revenues develop for wind, solar, gas, hydrogen + more by Alex Schmitt | posted on December 6, 2022
  • Hydrogen production in 2050: how much water will 74EJ need? by Herib Blanco | posted on July 22, 2021
  • Extract CO2 from our air, use it to create synthetic fuels by James Conca | posted on October 11, 2019
  • U.S. IRA: what can Europe do to stop its firms relocating to America? by Charles Wessner | posted on March 17, 2023
  • New U.S. study: damage per ton of CO2 costs $185, not the official $51 by Maximilian Auffhammer | posted on October 7, 2022
  • EU ETS and CBAM: what the big update to emissions trading rules means for Europe’s key sectors by Simon Göss | posted on January 16, 2023
  • Electricity Market Design: how can reforms accelerate the transition and help cut energy prices? by Simon Göss | posted on February 13, 2023

Information

  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy including Cookies
  • Terms and conditions for posting content
  • Comment Policy

More Information

  • About us
  • Authors
  • Contact Us

Most read in last 24 hours

  • Recent Posts
  • Recent Comments
  • Most Commented
  • Most Viewed
  • Tags
  • Geothermal’s full potential: 24/7 power everywhere, storage, environmental mineral extraction
  • The problem with CO2e: we need separate emissions data for each climate pollutant (methane, soot, etc.)
  • Should U.S. DOE risk funding methane-based Hydrogen production when CCS is still not proven?
  • ‘Green Deal Industrial Plan’ explainer: 40%+ of the top low-carbon technologies must be made in the EU by 2030
  • Silicon Valley Bank failed. Don’t blame the Climate Tech it backed
      • Geothermal’s full potential: 24/7 power everywhere, storage, environmental mineral extraction
      • carbon bubble
      • CCS
      • China
      • climate change
      • coal
      • coal power
      • diversification
      • electric cars
      • electricity
      • electricity market
      • emissions
      • energy2030
      • energy efficiency
      • energy security
      • energy storage
      • energy trade
      • energy transition
      • EU
      • EU energy policy
      • EU ETS
      • European gas market
      • EVs
      • financing
      • gas
      • geopolitics
      • grid
      • grids
      • hydrogen
      • infrastructure
      • natural gas
      • nuclear energy
      • oil
      • renewables
      • Russia
      • shale gas
      • smart grids
      • solar
      • solar power
      • sustainable mobility
      • transport
      • unconventionals
      • US
      • US energy policy
      • wind
      • wind power

      Recent Posts

      What is the future of Woody Biomass in the EU energy mix?

      Geothermal’s full potential: 24/7 power everywhere, storage, environmental mineral extraction

      The problem with CO2e: we need separate emissions data for each climate pollutant (methane, soot, etc.)

      Should U.S. DOE risk funding methane-based Hydrogen production when CCS is still not proven?

      ‘Green Deal Industrial Plan’ explainer: 40%+ of the top low-carbon technologies must be made in the EU by 2030

      Silicon Valley Bank failed. Don’t blame the Climate Tech it backed

      Copyright © 2023 Energy Post. All Rights Reserved